PFA vs RF ablation February 26, 2024 08:16PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 62 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation February 26, 2024 08:54PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,384 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation February 26, 2024 09:12PM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 202 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation February 27, 2024 08:21AM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 810 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation February 27, 2024 06:55PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 62 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation February 28, 2024 09:16PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 62 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation February 28, 2024 11:55PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,384 |
Quote
Dini
Based on the comment above are you saying that a PFA wouldn’t be successful because of my now persistent Afib, therefore would having the traditional RFA be a better option?
Re: PFA vs RF ablation February 29, 2024 03:08AM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 62 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation April 26, 2024 05:53PM |
Registered: 3 months ago Posts: 22 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation April 26, 2024 08:59PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,384 |
Quote
NoTrigger
Carey - You mentioned success rates of 75 - 90% for elite EPs in the post above and I was wondering where you found these numbers.
Mary
Quote
At 1 year, 90% were arrhythmia free off-AAD in non-PV ablation group, and 72% who did not receive non-PV triggers ablation at the index procedure (P = 0.035). The success rate of empirical LAA and CS isolation was 78.5% and 82% after the index and repeat procedure, respectively.
Re: PFA vs RF ablation May 03, 2024 02:47PM |
Registered: 3 months ago Posts: 22 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation May 03, 2024 03:13PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,384 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation May 04, 2024 03:42PM |
Registered: 3 months ago Posts: 22 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation May 04, 2024 04:41PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,384 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation May 05, 2024 02:28PM |
Registered: 3 months ago Posts: 22 |
Re: PFA vs RF ablation May 05, 2024 03:29PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,384 |