![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 month after second Natale ablation. January 07, 2019 05:39PM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 32 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 07, 2019 08:15PM |
Admin Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 5,842 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 07, 2019 08:59PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,102 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 07, 2019 09:04PM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 32 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 08, 2019 12:05AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 708 |
Quote
Carey
It means the ablation was a success. First, episodes of afib during the first 3 months are common, expected, and don't mean the procedure failed. Second, any arrhythmia lasting less than 30 seconds doesn't really count, so to speak. It's not considered an actual episode. What you've experienced sounds like a pretty calm, perfectly normal blanking period. Don't sweat it. You're doing fine and it's very unlikely your afib will return.
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 08, 2019 04:26PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 491 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 08, 2019 09:38PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 615 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 08, 2019 11:54PM |
Admin Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 5,842 |
Quote
mwcf
The EP comment you refer to is a bit odd given that an ablation is more typically supposed to prevent AF by blocking errant signals from the PVs.
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 09, 2019 01:35AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,758 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 09, 2019 01:39AM |
Admin Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 5,842 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 09, 2019 08:47AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 615 |
Quote
Carey
The EP comment you refer to is a bit odd given that an ablation is more typically supposed to prevent AF by blocking errant signals from the PVs.
I think what he probably meant was an ablation doesn't stop the errant cells causing the afib from firing. It just prevents those signals from going anywhere. I'm sure the cells in my PVs are blazing away with random, afib-inducing signals at this moment, along with some cells in the posterior wall, my coronary sinus, and my LAA. But they're all encircled by dead scar tissue now, which doesn't conduct signals, so those errant signals go nowhere. That's how ablations work. No mystery about that.
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 09, 2019 03:42PM |
Admin Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 5,842 |
Quote
mwcf
OK so a few lucky individuals like you have been successfully ablated to the point where - if I recall correctly - you don't even feel a single ectopic. That said, many other Natale ablatees do continue to notice PACs and short runs of PACs etc.
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 09, 2019 04:43PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,102 |
Quote
mwcf
OK so a few lucky individuals like you have been successfully ablated to the point where - if I recall correctly - you don't even feel a single ectopic. That said, many other Natale ablatees do continue to notice PACs and short runs of PACs etc.
Quote
Carey
Keep in mind that people who undergo successful ablations don't tend to follow forums like this. They just get on with their lives and never show up here. Those people are, in fact, the majority of ablation patients.
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 09, 2019 05:35PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 615 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 10, 2019 11:30PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 4,484 |
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 14, 2019 05:13PM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 132 |
Quote
mwcf
wolfpack, PEF ablation looks very promising indeed but remains several years off yet for the likes of us. Take a look at:
Also see
(Prof Jais who did my ablation at Bordeaux last year is heavily involved with this new technique and is very excited about it. He has confirmed to me that PEF ablation can be undertaken on folks who've already had RF ablations.)
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 14, 2019 06:27PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 615 |
Quote
Kleinkp
wolfpack, PEF ablation looks very promising indeed but remains several years off yet for the likes of us. Take a look at:
Also see
(Prof Jais who did my ablation at Bordeaux last year is heavily involved with this new technique and is very excited about it. He has confirmed to me that PEF ablation can be undertaken on folks who've already had RF ablations.)
How far out until this could become the norm? Something worth waiting for maybe? I'm on the list with Dr. Natale for this summer. Meds work well for me, but I'm wanting a long term solution.
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 15, 2019 12:33PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 708 |
Quote
wolfpack
Knowledge is power, folks. You'll get way more here than you ever will in a 15-minute office visit with an EP (or cardiologist, or any doctor for that matter).
Re: 4 month after second Natale ablation. January 15, 2019 08:12PM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 942 |
Quote
Carey
Why do PACs happen? Because it's very difficult to find and ablate every single ectopic source. Aside from the usual suspects in places like the PVs, there can be many single point sources spread around the atria and finding every one of them is extremely difficult because they don't cooperate and fire while you're in the lab with mapping catheters in place to locate them. So quite often the result is the worst offenders are found and isolated, which stops your afib, but a few more remain hidden and still fire on occasion, resulting in the PACs that bother so many of us.