Welcome to the Afibber’s Forum
Serving Afibbers worldwide since 1999
Moderated by Shannon and Carey


Afibbers Home Afibbers Forum General Health Forum
Afib Resources Afib Database Vitamin Shop


Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Bolouke

Posted by lisa s 
Bolouke
July 08, 2012 03:13AM
I never heard of it before about a week ago. It was put in the same category as nattokinase, but was considered better(more effective). Any opinions?

Even better, any studies?

Thanks,

lisa
__________________________

So much of medicine is looking solely down the wrong end of the gun barrel, and that is really a pity for all of us---Shannon
Re: Bolouke
July 08, 2012 01:41PM
Lisa... Lumbrokinase has been around a long time...it is effective and also more costly than nattokinase. It's mentioned in the Conference Room sessions on nattokinase... #39 and 40.

Jackie
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login