is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 29, 2023 06:29PM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 122 |
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 29, 2023 08:04PM |
Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 728 |
Quote
Marco
Lasy year, when I was searching on the forum, I found this file that is called "prescription for LAF". I have tried to search for it on the forum but I cannot find it anymore. I'm wondering if it was taken down due to old info. are all the recommendations in the file still ok to follow?
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 29, 2023 08:38PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,343 |
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 03:58PM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 122 |
Quote
Carey
That PDF you attached is an AFib Report written by Hans, and since you have it I'm not sure what it is you're trying to find. A post talking about? If so, notice that the search feature only searches back the last 30 days by default. You have to use Advanced search and choose "all dates" if you want to search further back, which obviously you do.
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 04:05PM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 122 |
Quote
Daisy
Lasy year, when I was searching on the forum, I found this file that is called "prescription for LAF". I have tried to search for it on the forum but I cannot find it anymore. I'm wondering if it was taken down due to old info. are all the recommendations in the file still ok to follow?
The idea of Lone Afib hasn’t stood up to research as it has become clear that Afib occurs as a manifestation of changes in cardiac tissue—so it is not understood to be “lone” these days.
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 04:49PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,343 |
Quote
Marco
I understand, so as today this is the current thought that applies to all Afibbers. Regardless of what type of Afib someone has, there is always some changes in cardiac tissues causing it, correct?
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 05:40PM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 122 |
Quote
Carey
I understand, so as today this is the current thought that applies to all Afibbers. Regardless of what type of Afib someone has, there is always some changes in cardiac tissues causing it, correct?
Yep, that's pretty much it. The technical term being used is atrial myopathy.
Worth noting the we took the word "lone" out of this forum's title at least two years ago.
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 06:30PM |
Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 728 |
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 07:27PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,343 |
Quote
Daisy
Nope, only a specializes type of MRI that is expensive and rarely done as it is not widely available.
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 09:17PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 4,222 |
Quote
Carey
Delayed enhancement MRI. I actually had one done at Yale in 2014. Basically, it's able to identify fibrosis in the atria, which is a hallmark of atrial myopathy/afib.
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? June 30, 2023 11:09PM |
Admin Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 5,343 |
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? July 01, 2023 09:33AM |
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 51 |
Quote
Carey
It showed moderate fibrosis in the left atrium, which is probably better than expected considering I'd been experiencing afib since 2002. Yes, I'm doing well now and have been since 2017, but I sure wasn't in 2014.
Honestly, I'm not sure what value that MRI actually had. It didn't alter treatment, change the diagnosis, or even confirm the diagnosis since that was already beyond question.
Re: is "prescription for LAF" still valid/up to date? July 01, 2023 05:29PM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 122 |