TAF, That's partially true because other risks increase, such as phrenic nerve palsy. Medtronic has been successful in marketing cryoablation as a safer alternative to RF particularly for the younger EP's coming up on the learning curve. Usually, it is offered up as the first option and RF would be used in touch ups. That is because cryo balloon can only address PVI and not other triggers since it lacks navigational flexibility. I think the best option is to find a high volume center with lots of experience in complex AF. They may still recommend Cryo after mapping study as an approach that has a high likelihood of solving the problem. I would be reticent about any EP that offers cryo right off the bat without knowing the patient's history and understanding the likely triggers. The latter would just be acknowledgement that the EP and the center lacks skills and still coming up on learning curve.