Anti-AFIB, DenverFox, Jackie, Elizabeth,
'Roid-Rage', while it can and does happen at times from overdoses for that person of mostly large supra-physiologic doses of synthetic anabolic or adrenal steroid hormone-like drugs, it simply does not happen with smaller physiologic doses of Hydrocortisone which I must emphasize once again for clarity and distinction is pure Bio-identical cortisol chemically indistinguishable from your very own cortisol that is sustaining each of our lives this very moment.
At some point, society must start moving away from demonizing the word 'steroids' which not a single one of us would be able to function or survive at all without, in at least barely functional levels, if we were to suddenly find our bodies bereft of those life giving biochemicals entirely. That is the first order of business before we can move past the very understandable knee-jerk reactions we often see in the press, based on incomplete and misleading misunderstandings of just how these substances work in our bodies, and again, it is entirely understandable why the majority of us have inherited such jaded opinions about these drugs, and often rightfully so, due to how the press and even well-meaning but imprecise physicians toss around the term in such pejorative terms, as well as from how many of us have experienced the very same unwanted side effects of excessive doses of largely synthetic derivatives of the true bio-identical biochemicals they are loosely based on.
Its an unfortunate situation, but one that is slowly improving with better education.
While HC is by far the preferred BHRT for low cortisol replacement, the typical side effects you three mention above no doubt mostly from synthetics, would be vanishingly rare as well from similar small doses of prednisolone or methylprednisolone in the 4mg to 6mg per day range .. and this is even without any of the very important DHEA and/or other anabolic hormone counterbalancing added in along with such a prescription to help reduce such catabolic side effects of mostly synthetic based hormones. It can happen with synthetics in particular, but usually that is when there is not adequate counterbalance. You do want to take these even these some what safer synthetics for the shortest required time in any event.
You can also get such excessive dose side effects from super huge overdoses of testosterone over time, especially when the person already has an adequate level of these endogenous 'steroids' in their own systems, as do so many young athletes whose illegal use of these hormones to gain an edge in sports competition, usually in doses Far larger than even a deeply deficient person would require for simple replacement levels,
A big part of the problem is that doctors are typically only trained in medical school about what excessive 'synthetic' steroid hormone usage looks like and the many unwanted side effects as we have all heard about, and many of us have seen first or second hand. Until relatively recently, there was almost no emphasis at all on what symptoms of declining optimal levels of these hormones look like in the patient, except briefly in passing during Med school. All the emphasis is placed on scaring young physicians away from too liberal use of powerful anti-inflammatory doses of mostly synthetic versions of these drugs, and very rightly so!
In any event, Anti-AFIB, Ive attended very many AMA sponsored and certified BHRT medical and fellowship training conferences in which existing MDs from all over the world attend for re-education about how the endocrine system really works in more detail, and about the wisdom of first trying to restore a natural optimal balance of largely 'bio-identical' versions of our very own hormones when they are found to be dysfunctionally low (or high in the case of TSH when there is hypothyroidism) , first and foremost, before resorting either to a host of symptom controls drugs that they had been trained to use their entire medical careers to treat what they now learn are, for the most part, largely clear signs and symptoms of one or more of these critically important endogenous biochemicals that have become deficient over time from aging, poor diet, toxicities, excess stress etc.
Over the years I have seen literally thousands of physicians who have come for retraining and return for more in-depth courses and I have been consistently struck how many come at first out of curiosity or because they have seen or heard from fellow MDs who have seen the light and becomes fellowship certified themselves what a positive impact these protocols have had on their patients over the years compared to the old schooled narrow view of endocrinology which only recognizes a problem ( at least for adrenal and to a degree thyroid dysfunction, only when there is near total failure of cortisol production, for example.
Time and time again, I have seen a good number of by the old school book Endos, in particular, whose speciality society tends to be amongst the most rigid, controlling and hide-bound among medical specialties .. at least this is what I am told, verbatim, by so many 'reformed' and more enlightened endocrinologist themselves, once they have seen the light and begun to broaden their vision and tool kit for helping a far larger number of their patients who, previously they would just give prozac, xanax, ambien, ritalin, and viagra, etc etc, to mask and placate their patients coming to them for the many clear signs and symptoms of hormonal and neurotransmitter dysfunction, but for which their blood tests did not indicate near total failure of het gland, even when on the very low end of 'normal' range, so that must mean they their hormone levels are perfectly fine and it must be a deficiency in prozax, xanax, or ambien etc etc the patient is suffering from.
In any event, I have seem far too may skeptical and questioning Endo's come to these conferences and have everyone of their doubts and questions which had been ingrained int their thinking from their medical school training, only to see them transform over several days to recognizing the common sense and the huge body of peer-reviewed evidence presented at these conferences often by other world renowned Endo's supporting these more inclusive and more progressive insight on their own specialty.
I have yet to see one Endo who came to these conferences who was anything other than at least far more open minded and willing to at least acknowledge the protocols made sense, after even a 4 days conference. And so often those that, really hear the message and begin adopting those protocols in their own proactive become the most avid and enthusiastic proponents at future similar conferences and symposiums, after going home and seeing first hand the validity and real progress their patients have made when using these well developed protocols compared to their previous standard of care.
That being said, I do want to underscore too that all the cautions and concerns about overuse of larger supraphysiologic doses of any steroid-like hormone, especially synthetic ones that cause the lions share of the problems are valid and very real. Its is not for nothing that otherwise very smart physicians have become convinced that their view of these agents is the only right one.
Indeed, I don't know any enlightened Endo's who would advocate long term indefinite use of stronger synthetic steroids in larger doses, and especially not without optimal range anabolic hormone restoration, if needed, for the patient.
But the story for small physiologic dose of hydrocortisone (HC), backed by robust optimal range anabolic hormone levels in the body, is very diferent, and this protocol when carefully followed and understood with a skilled physician working with you, will NOT cause the kind of rightly feared side effects DenverFox, Anti-AFIB and Jackie mention above .. even when taken for very long term periods with proper monitoring, surveillance and training by the patient as well in how to spot any signs or symptoms of overdose, these protocols can, when required for restoring better health, be done safely longer term.
Nevertheless, in every case, the goal is to use the smallest dose of HC required for eliminating or minimizing deficiency symptoms and physical signs, and for the shortest time required to give exhausted depleted adrenals a good rest from the onslaught of daily stress demands of all kinds. The goal being, for people coming in with less than 'Addisons'-like' failure, or chronic long term depletion such that they might require indefinite HC therapy, to gradually wean them off very slowly after a sustained period of maintenance level therapy following a very careful protocol that includes stress dosing as needed during the weaning process, to help give the person every chance for their own adrenal system to bounce back and restore more normal range functioning while achieving better energy and overall good health.
If adrenal dysfunction is a real issue for you, the older you are when you get started at this, the less likelihood that you will be able to fully restore cortisol production to healthy endogenous levels without at least some degree of ongoing HC support in small to very modest doses back by DHEA at the very least.
And you definitely DO NOT want to engage in this therapy unless your doctor is fully trained and fellowship certified in BHRT.
With such a wide split within the specialty of Endocrinology between the old school and new school docs, I've come to be as discriminating in which Endo's or BHRT docs one should seek out as I am with ablationists for persistent AFIB. Going to just any regular old school Endo and you start asking him for a BHRT work up you are likely to get a blank stare at best or an utterly misinformed diatribe at worst.
And Denver Fox, I fully understand your reluctance to consider anything associated with the word 'steroid' after your wife's experience with obviously a form and dosage that was not appropriate for her. Just keep in mind that when dealing with real natural cortisol and real DHEA, testostoerne etc, that people who.are truly deficient require, they will not have an 'allergic' reaction as your own body produces these essential hormones every moment of the day. Though, rarely, some may react to a filler in a pill or topical form of a bio-identical hormone which is fairly easy to adjust.
Generally, these reactions you folks describe above are far more common with large doses of synthetic drugs, and to a lesser degree could manifest even with bio-identicals when they are used in far too high a dose for too long without balancing hormones, and/or if the person has had a long standing deficiency in that class of hormones and are suddenly given a 'one size fits all' dose that their body simply can no long handle without a period of careful slow upward titration such that their dormant hormone receptors can gradually wake up again an assimilate the flood of new hormones ( IM speaking of Bio-identical hormones here in this case as synthetics generally have much poorer receptor binding and are typically not recognized fully by the body as their derivative natural hormone ... before the body is able to tolerate and thrive on a more optimal level of dosing.
All the time, we see people who have long be deficient in DHEA, for example, and who then have aura headaches or acne or oily skin, or may feel out of sorts with bit too much energy from starting right off the bat with a typically recommended DHEA dose. However, that is usually from far too large a dose of DHEA for their dormant bodies to handle at the start. It took me a full year of gradually upward titration, starring at only 4mg a day that I could initially tolerate, before my body could easily adapt to the ideal range now of 20mg sublingual a day giving me now an optimal 400ug/dl of serum DHEA-sulfate I now maintain.
For average size women, an optimal level in serum testing is typically around 280ug/dl of DHEA-Sulfate. So many people get bad advice about how to uses these natural agents, then try them with too large or an inappropriate form, have some reaction and then give up and recount these bad experience stories the rest of their lives, alas, missing out on if they only had had a more experienced hand in guiding them back to a more healthy range of these important biochemicals and avoiding such pitfalls.
Anyway, Anti-AFIB, you can get the book 'Safe Uses of Cortisol' by William Jeffries.. its an older out of print book t hat is still in circulation as he was the original pioneering researcher into Cortisol soon after HC was made. But a far more modern and up to date that described in detail how to replace and manage all 18 treatable hormone deficiencies with largely identical hormones is tour de force "The Hormone Handbook' by renowned Belgian Endocrinologist Dr Thierry Hertoghe, which is the literally Bible every BHRT doc I know os uses nearly every day in their practice.
It is a $495.00 thoroughly researched masterpiece of a book for physicians, the back half of this large tome being all the many references from the peer reviewed literature supporting every single therapy and recommendation in the book. Though it is mainly a medical reference for doctors, a medically astute layman can gain a huge amount from it as well.
There are many other good references out there as well and if you want to know more you can PM me with your phone number and when I have time after I return from California that l leave tomorrow morning too for my next TEE and the ISLAA conference this coming weekend, I will try to call and give you some more resources to investigate, but we are getting a bit off topic here of AFIB, even though this subject can have a very supportive effect on Cardiovascular and arrhythmia management as well.
Shannon
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/04/2015 01:55PM by Shannon.