Welcome to the Afibber’s Forum
Serving Afibbers worldwide since 1999
Moderated by Shannon and Carey


Afibbers Home Afibbers Forum General Health Forum
Afib Resources Afib Database Vitamin Shop


Calcification, yes or no
February 16, 2015 06:13PM
I had a C scan about 2 weeks ago of my pelvic area, they said I had calcification of my aorta. I had an appt. with my EP doctor last Wed., I took the report with me and he immediately ordered a ultra sound, the ultra sound showed my aorta to be clear, he showed the picture to me. My next door neighbor works with C scans and said that she would trust the C scan as to the accuracy, now that is worrying me again, what and who is correct. Does anyone have any insight.

Liz
Re: Calcification, yes or no
February 17, 2015 04:46PM
Hi Liz,

Discuss it will your EP, the CT is better for some images and Ultrasound is better for others. I know they use ultrasound often for Carotid artery intima media thickness and plaque build up detection, and also use CT and even MRI for some vascular imaging as well.

It also has a lot to do with the quality of the CT or Ultrasound and, in particular, the experience and accuracy of the interpreting radiologist. Your treating physician should have much more experience with both methods and can reassure you best.

For example, for the uterine fibroid and ovarian cyst that were discovered originally via contrast CT during my wife's kidney tumor screening scans, the head gynecological oncologist/surgeon at MD Anderson, had Magdalena then get a confirming Ultrasound on these soft tissue structures as that perspective is better suited for really diagnosing and planning on what to do, if anything when dealing with those areas of the body.

The same may not be true for cardiovascular plaque and arteriosclerosis issues, so check back with your EP with your concern and he will explain why he is comfortable with the Ultrasound results since he has seen both the CT and Ultrasound and apparently told you not to worry.

Also, remember, a high precision device like a CT or MRI can find all sorts of artifacts that they will take note of and report on as a matter of discovery, but that doesn't mean that everything they mention detecting is clinically relevant .. in fact most such finding are indeed benign artifacts overall. Perhaps the Ultrasound helps sort out what scenarios are worth treating and what are not worth bothering or with or worrying about? In any event, your EP should be able to easily sort that one out for you and set you mind at ease.

Shannon
Re: Calcification, yes or no
February 17, 2015 10:30PM
Shannon;

Thank you for your reply----

Dr. Lehmann wanted an ultrasound to rule out an aneurysm, I do not have that, the person that did the ultrasound showed me the pictures and said everything looked good, I didn't see my doctor after the ultrasound. When I spoke to my arthro doc. he said that a C Scan is more reliable in picking up the calcification than a ultrasound, so I am now concerned. I sent an email via my web page with U of Michigan to Dr. Lehmann, so hopefully I will hear from him within a few days.

liz
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login