Get uncivilized!! continues with this excerpt from George Weber's
Toba Volcano, Chapter 5,
Through the Bottleneck:
1.
A most peculiar mammal: Homo sapiens
Human beings, in civilizations that think about such things, pride themselves on their (occasionally) towering intelligence, their scientific, technological, philosophical, economic and artistic accomplishments. Scientific nomenclature knows humans as
Homo sapiens ("wise man") which nicely reflects the high self-esteem characteristic of the species.
Leaving the towering but hard-to-measure intelligence aside, there are other, much more easily measured if rather less well-publicised aspects of Homo sapiens that set off the species quite spectacularly from other life forms on earth:
Of all living things on earth weighing more than a few grams or ounces,
(a) Homo sapiens is today the only truly world-wide species, living in flat and rugged, in hot and cold, in dry and wet, in high and in low places, and practically everywhere in between. The species has recently even managed to gain a foothold in Antarctica and gone for a walk on the moon. In large cities the species has also created its own environment, something no other large animal has done.
(b) Homo sapiens has by far the largest numbers of individuals (estimated 6,300,000,000 in 2003) of any large species
(c) Local variations (known as "races") also show extraordinarily low levels of within- and between- population genetic variation in comparison to the nearest relatives, the apes. This odd fact supports an extremely recent origin for Homo sapiens (ref. Ferris et al., 1981; Ruvolo et al., 1993). Only around 10% of the limited human genetic variation is accounted for by differences between populations (ref. Lewontin, 1972; Relethford, 1995).
(d) Homo sapiens has very little genetic diversity despite its huge numbers.
The last point is the oddest - and the least widely known. It is also one of the arguments in favour of a relatively recent bottleneck (e.g. Toba) rather than one much longer ago (e.g. one proposed for 2 million years ago by the "regional continuity" supporters (ref. Hawks, et al, 2000). The low genetic diversity implies that the present teeming multitude of human beings trace back to a numerically tiny and relatively recent founding population.
A geneticist had this to say on Homo sapiens:
... we have sequenced 10 kb of non-coding DNA in a region of low recombination at Xq13.3 from 70 humans representing all major language groups of the world. In addition, the same sequence has been determined from 30 chimpanzees, representing all major subspecies, as well as bonobos. Comparison to humans reveals an almost four-fold higher diversity and a three-fold greater age of the most recent common ancestor of the chimpanzee sequences. Phylogenetic analyses show the sequences from the different chimpanzee subspecies to be intermixed ... These data, as well as preliminary work in the other great apes, indicate that
the human genome is unique in carrying extremely little nucleotide diversity. (ref. Kaessman H. et al, 2000)
While human overall genetic diversity is low, what diversity exists, is highest in Africa. This fact is one of the major arguments in favour of the "Out of Africa" theory of human origins:
... the gene pool in Africa contains more variation than elsewhere, and the genetic variation found outside of Africa represents only a subset of that found within the African continent. From a genetic perspective,
all humans are therefore Africans, either residing in Africa or in recent exile. (ref. Pääbo S., 2001)
=====
(continue at [
www.andaman.org])