Welcome to the Afibber’s Forum
Serving Afibbers worldwide since 1999
Moderated by Shannon and Carey


Afibbers Home Afibbers Forum General Health Forum
Afib Resources Afib Database Vitamin Shop


Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Ghostwriting of research studies and journal articles

Posted by Jackie 
Ghostwriting of research studies and journal articles
January 16, 2011 10:34AM
Here’s an example of why we can’t totally rely upon or trust 100% what’s published in studies and articles. If you aren't aware of this practice, then it's time for another Awareness update, which, as most of you know is my mission: To Create Awareness.

In this very interesting observation, “The Specter of Ghostwritten Studies”, Julie Kotter of Townsend Letter offers a brief but pointed summary about which many have been warning for a very long time.

This helps explain why it seems that some of the skeletons are falling out of the closet as so many newer drugs are being recalled, the research data reviewed and the findings are indicating that important facts were ignored or minimized so as not to appear detrimental or cause a delay in rushing a new, lucrative drug to market. Only after the drugs reached the consumer guinea pigs (aka healthcare consumers) have severe side affects, including death, have been brought to light as the research is investigated.

She says:
...."The use of ghostwriters – uncredited contributors to a published article – is not new. Like conscious and unconscious manipulation of study data and design, ghostwriting has been one of the hidden skeletons in the research closet. Recent lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies have uncloaked their widespread use of ghostwriting companies, also known as medical communications firms. These companies are charged with getting drug-favorable articles into prestigious journals. They are hired to write deliberately biased articles masquerading as science.

As David H. Freedman says in his article "Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science," "The ultimate protection against research error and bias is supposed to come from the way scientists constantly retest each other's results – except they don't. Only the most prominent findings are likely to be put to the test, because there's likely to be publication payoff in firming up the proof, or contradicting it...."

Continue[www.townsendletter.com]
Scroll down to " The Specter of Ghostwritten Studies" segment.

Very interesting resource links included at the end of the article.

Jackie

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login