<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>New Study</title>
        <description> Is anyone familiar with a recent completed study that said that if a patient goes one year without any out of rhythm episodes then there is no difference in negative events whether you are on a blood thinner or not.

My local cardiologist told me this today and suggested it may be possible to get off the Xarelto I am taking. I am a little apprehensive about this possibility.

I went 6 months after going off Flecainide before going out of rhythm. I tried a few large doses of Flecainide but it did not work. I then went on 100mg of Flecainide twice a day and stayed in NSR for the next seven months. I then decided to go off again telling myself I would get another ablation (Natale said I would probably need another when he did the 1st one). It has now been over a year off Flecainide/Metoprolol and as far as I know I have been in NSR the whole time. However, since I have no symptoms I am not 100% sure (I do check with my Kardia mobile, I’ve had a couple of heart monitor sessions).

The cardiologist suggested either an Apple Watch or an inserted Loop reader. If no incidents after a period of time he suggest getting off Xarelto and on aspirin(I also have a high CAC score of 520 so he still would like thinner blood with less bleeding potential. 

Appreciate feedback</description>
        <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200087#msg-200087</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 20:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201682#msg-201682</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201682#msg-201682</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks for feedback Carey. I will probably go forward with it. Not sue I will use him for Watchman later on. I liked his background and fact he would do the implant w/o general anasthesia.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Geocappy</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 03:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201681#msg-201681</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201681#msg-201681</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I&#039;m no Medicare expert but I&#039;m skeptical that they require documentation of recent afib activity. It was my understanding that they&#039;ve been covering the Watchman for some time now based solely on an afib diagnosis and a CHADS-Vasc score &gt;2. You certainly meet the CHADS-Vasc requirement. But he does this for a living so he probably knows more than I do. You could always just call Medicare and ask. <br />
<br />
In any case, just doing the loop recorder can&#039;t do any harm. I wouldn&#039;t cancel that.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 03:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201678#msg-201678</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201678#msg-201678</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yes, that is what he meant that I preferred loop recorder which was bs. I went to him because the PA in my cardiologist office said she thought he was better than the 1st EP. I went there because I wanted the Watchman. This EP told me basically I couldn’t get Watchman approved by Medicare unless I could show a current abnormal reading on a loop recorder. The EP preferred to do the loop recorder 1st which makes no sense to me. He only talk to me for 5 minutes and basically said no to Watchman w/o loop recorder. I am not sure what the loop recorder will do. Even if it shows nothing, I don’t think 3 months is enough to go off xarelto to baby aspirin at 72 years old, diabetes, moderate hypertension, and sleep apnea. I don’t know what he is thinking. Puts me in a bind. Can’t go back to 1st EP and don’t know how to proceed with this EP. If I choose to cancel loop recorder proceedure. On the other hand does it hurt to do the loop recorder to get a good monitoring? My concern is it doesn’t show anything after 3 months. He now says I am not a candidate for Watchman so it is Xarelto or baby aspirin<br />
<br />
I can’t see how I wouldn’t qualify for Watchman now.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Geocappy</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201677#msg-201677</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201677#msg-201677</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>Geocappy</strong><br />
BTW, reread the new EP’s notes and he said I preferred loop recorder over watchman.</div></blockquote>
<br />
That makes no sense. They do 100% different things. Maybe he meant you prefer loop recorder over Watchman <i>at this time.</i>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 21:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201676#msg-201676</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,201676#msg-201676</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Another update. I finally decided that a Watchman made the most sense. The PA in my cardiologist office recommended another EP in the same Healtcare System here in Orlando and got me around the internal complications with switching doctors in the same system. Took me 4 months but had an appointment which I looked forward to based on my current situation. <br />
<br />
I have been takin Dihydroberberine to allow me to get off diabetic meds (my A1c is 6.3) via a low carb diet. I was also on 5mg of Rosuvastatin due to 520 CAC score. Thought all was well looking forward to possibly getting off my xarelto in the future after watchman and then I read AI which told me I should not be taking any berberine product (taking 2 years) with xarelto or rosuvastatin as it increases possibility of bleeding and effects of statin. Despite having a cardiologist, EP, Primary Care and Endocrinologist this had never been brought to my attention even though they all had my med and supplement list.<br />
<br />
I digress, at my 5-10 minute meeting with new EP he mention he heard of Natale (did stints at John Hopkins and Cleveland Clinic). Mention a few notes and then said he could immediately give me Watchman because Traditional Medicare might not cover due to no evidence of current Afib. He recommended three month loop recorder and his notes say if evidence of silent afib then do Watchman. Otherwise, consider move off xarelto to baby Aspirin. I am scheduled for loop recorder in 3 weeks.<br />
<br />
After reviewing all my heart related notes and Medicare regulations and posing questions to AI, I believe I should easily be approved by Medicare. I have documented history of afib, documented c.h.a.d. Score of 3-4, and history of several nose bleeds including documented trip to emergency to stop one of the nosebleeds. BTW, reread the new EP’s notes and he said I preferred loop recorder over watchman.<br />
<br />
I am confused and considering cancelling loop recorder proceedure. Need some of the forum’s sage advice.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Geocappy</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200944#msg-200944</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200944#msg-200944</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Update. Went to my local EP as recommended by my Cardiologist. He said no way would he have me off of my Xarelto. He said at 72 with Diabetes, sleep apnea, CAC score of 520 he said there is no way I should be off blood thinner. He said study my cardiologist is referring to was for low CHAD people. Not me.<br />
<br />
He said Afib symptoms are irrelevant as there are other reasons for risk of blood pooling other than afib and symptoms are not the only important factors and he would not do a loop recorder because the results would not change his opinion due to my high CHAD score.<br />
<br />
He said the only way for me to be potentially of blood thinner is if a Watchman is done. Then if successful it maybe possible to switch blood thinner protocol. Question: Is this board as adamant about Natale doing the Watchman as they are him doing the ablation. I flew to Texas for my ablation but my local EP is suppose to be very experienced with the Watchman.<br />
<br />
I would appreciate some feedback]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Geocappy</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 16:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200196#msg-200196</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200196#msg-200196</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Had my LAA closed off 19 years ago during a Mini Maze. This has been checked many times for leaks or other issues via CT scans and during a touch up ablation. For years I was advised to consider a NOAC even though closed LAA. More recently my EP and Cardiologist feels that it is not necessary. I am not eligible for a watchman because of that surgical closure years ago. I do take a baby aspirin twice a week for other reasons. I am 76. If you look at my CHAD Vasc score, you would think I should be on a blood thinner. It would appear that having a closure influences that score. Check out Dr. Wolf&#039;s web site for his take on  LAA closure.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>sldabrowski</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 14:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200118#msg-200118</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200118#msg-200118</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>Carey</strong><br />
It has been uncommon but it&#039;s becoming increasingly common. However, if the ablation is going to touch the LAA, it&#039;s generally avoided because the mouth of the LAA where the Watchman fits can be swollen, so choosing the correct size would be hit or miss. When the swelling goes down, you could end up with a leaky Watchman.</div></blockquote>
<br />
I think this is still Natale‘s policy as I know someone who just had an extensive ablation and their Watchman was scheduled for several months later. It was also true for me a few years ago – he isolated my LAA and asked me to come back three months later for the Watchmen.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Daisy</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200117#msg-200117</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200117#msg-200117</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ It has been uncommon but it&#039;s becoming increasingly common. However, if the ablation is going to touch the LAA, it&#039;s generally avoided because the mouth of the LAA where the Watchman fits can be swollen, so choosing the correct size would be hit or miss. When the swelling goes down, you could end up with a leaky Watchman.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200116#msg-200116</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200116#msg-200116</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thank you for all your input. I thought I would just take the pill for life until my Cardiologist put in my head the higher risk of bleeding as you get older.<br />
<br />
BTW, is it common or uncommon to get a watchman put in at the same time as one’s first ablation? A friend of mine’s EP is suggesting it.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Geocappy</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200092#msg-200092</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200092#msg-200092</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This used to be the reasoning behind a prophylaxis like apixaban or rivaroxaban if one does not have a Watchman, and does not have a way to determine if they are in an arrythmia with chaotic or ultra-rapid atrial pace. One could even make the argument that sedentary people, those who sit a lot (gaming, flying, surfing until the wee hours on their PC) might be better off with a DOAC to stave off deep vein thrombosis. But a year with no detectable arrhythmia, while probably a good sign, is not a guarantee that there IS NO arrhythmia.<br />
<br />
I have two personal opinions on this:<br />
<br />
a. even a few minutes of continuous AF is raising the risk of a clot forming in an open LAA.  If that clot gets dislodged after a couple of NSR beats where the increased and proper flow of blood commences anew.....; and<br />
<br />
b. unless a person with a formal diagnosis of AF at any of the four commonly-accepted stages can be sure they are NOT in AF, there is always going to be a risk of AF going unnoticed (happens all the time!).  If those short <u>paroxysmal</u> runs get along into an hour, four, 12, and then lurch back into NSR, that&#039;s a long time with poor blood circulation in the LAA. I think a full year is a reasonable length of time after which one could stop taking a DOAC, but not if there is no Watchman in place with demonstrably no leakage, and not if the person has no practical means of monitoring 24/7 for almost all of those 12 months.  From that kind of reasoning, it becomes a personal choice to continue or to discontinue, with the associated risks borne by the individual. Personally, and as an older male, I do sit a lot at my computer soaking up everything I find interesting. Just that practice, alone, puts me at a risk of DVT. Additionally, while I used to know immediately I was in AF, I&#039;m not sure I do now. I don&#039;t sense that I ever have it, and my watch doesn&#039;t indicate that I do, but can I be sure?  Even when asleep?  Plus, no Watchman.  That puts me in very iffy territory, so I just take the damned pill.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>gloaming</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200091#msg-200091</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200091#msg-200091</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This is closely related, a pill-in-the-pocket approach to anticoagulants.<br />
Here is a youtube video  <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvqegDFsgjg"  rel="nofollow">Yoork Cardiology</a>  and here is the study <a href="https://reactaf.com/"  rel="nofollow">reactaf.com</a>. Here is the original paper <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4789135/"  rel="nofollow">PIP Study</a>.<br />
<br />
The basic idea is if you are in AFIB for more than one hour, go on a fast-acting blood thinner for only 30 days. I think the problem in the past was that some people don&#039;t know they are in AFIB. But with today&#039;s wearable that should not be a problem.<br />
<br />
I am hoping the study shows good results. I am 70 with a CHADS score of 1 and am not on blood thinners per cardiologist&#039;s recommendation. I rarely go into AFIB and when I do it is usually less than an hour. When I turn 75 I get my second CHADS point, so I am hoping for the PIP approach. BTW I am very symptomatic.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>MikeN</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200090#msg-200090</guid>
            <title>Re: New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200090#msg-200090</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Could be true but that&#039;s news to me. I&#039;ll have to go looking for it.<br />
<br />
And it seems like strange reasoning considering that aspirin has a higher bleed risk than the DOACs like Xarelto and Eliquis.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 03:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200087#msg-200087</guid>
            <title>New Study</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200087,200087#msg-200087</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Is anyone familiar with a recent completed study that said that if a patient goes one year without any out of rhythm episodes then there is no difference in negative events whether you are on a blood thinner or not.<br />
<br />
My local cardiologist told me this today and suggested it may be possible to get off the Xarelto I am taking. I am a little apprehensive about this possibility.<br />
<br />
I went 6 months after going off Flecainide before going out of rhythm. I tried a few large doses of Flecainide but it did not work. I then went on 100mg of Flecainide twice a day and stayed in NSR for the next seven months. I then decided to go off again telling myself I would get another ablation (Natale said I would probably need another when he did the 1st one). It has now been over a year off Flecainide/Metoprolol and as far as I know I have been in NSR the whole time. However, since I have no symptoms I am not 100% sure (I do check with my Kardia mobile, I’ve had a couple of heart monitor sessions).<br />
<br />
The cardiologist suggested either an Apple Watch or an inserted Loop reader. If no incidents after a period of time he suggest getting off Xarelto and on aspirin(I also have a high CAC score of 520 so he still would like thinner blood with less bleeding potential. <br />
<br />
Appreciate feedback]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Geocappy</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 22:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
