<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Atrial Fibrillation Forum - AFIBBERS FORUM</title>
        <description>A forum for sharing experiences regarding atrial fibrillation and other atrial tachy-arrhythmias.</description>
        <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/list.php?9</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201299#msg-201299</guid>
            <title>Re: Dairy Products</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201299#msg-201299</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I have never seen or had an issue with dairy products and afib.  I have yogurt every morning, milk with most dinners and ice cream after every dinner.  Cream in my coffee.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201298#msg-201298</guid>
            <title>Re: Dairy Products</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201298#msg-201298</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>GeorgeN</strong><br />
From an autoimmune perspective, dairy from genetically A2 casein cows is better than from A1 casein cows.  Fermented A2 casein milk products like yogurt &amp; some cheeses are better.  Goat and sheep cheeses are better they are generally rich in A2 casein and medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), which are easier to digest and less inflammatory than standard cow&#039;s milk products, as I understand.<br />
<br />
Most standard US cows genetically make A1 casein.  There are some A2&#039;s in this country, more in Europe.</div></blockquote>
<br />
George,<br />
<br />
That is quite interesting and while I hadn&#039;t really looked into it, I started buying the 3 carton pack of Whole Organic Milk at Costco back in maybe December. I also have Hashimoto&#039;s which also has its own issues with dairy.  I made the switch from Unsweetened Almond Vanilla Milk at that time and noticed recently the A2 designation on the carton vs the grocery store without an A2. I haven&#039;t had any issues with my switch and basically was going on trust of the Costco Buyers who decide what products to carry.  I should read a bit more on the subject when I have some spare time. I only use 1 cup per day with my Orgain Protein smoothie or 1/2 cup with my Kodiak Seeds and Nuts Oatmeal with some blue/black/rasp berry mix.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Qwackertoo</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201297#msg-201297</guid>
            <title>Re: Fluoroscopy</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201297#msg-201297</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>Carey</strong><br />
<br />
What is the difference between a touch up ablation w/Watchman placement vs a Re-Do with Watchman placement?  When appointment is made within 3 days after the initial ablation?  <br />
<br />
A touch-up procedure is finding the spots where afib signals are getting past the previous ablation lines. It&#039;s usually one or two burns vs dozens for a full ablation. And the Watchman is no more than another 10-15 minutes. My Watchman procedure was a total of 20 minutes and that included the entire time needed to insert and position the catheters. If a touch-up is being done at the same time, inserting and positioning catheters has already happened.</div></blockquote>
<br />
Thank you for the reply, Carey<br />
<br />
Mine was classified as a Re-Do along with the planned Watchman placement 6 weeks after initial ablation which was more extensive than a PVI with 72 PF only no RF.  It has been awhile but in re-reading and studying everything in my history, especially last week after my first visit in quite some time with my local Cardiologist caused me to wonder on the terminology. I believe it was 58 PF applications of energy and a little less than 1 minute for the RF plus the Watchman.  The LAA was re-isolated and from what I&#039;ve read it is thicker tissue and does tend to regain connections after initial isolation plus a few other re-connections during second go round.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Qwackertoo</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201296#msg-201296</guid>
            <title>Re: Fluoroscopy</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201296#msg-201296</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The paperwork I received to educate me about two (2) MIBI treadmill stress tests with contrast said that each such encounter was equivalent two 500 chest x-rays.  Then, I had other scans, an angiogram, and two ablations, each with fluoroscopy.  Plus two chest x-rays as part of the pre-ablation workups.  I may eventually die from a tumor caused by all that radiation, if not from the countless hours I have flown above 25K feet ASL.  And lived at 15K &#039; in the Andes for four years. But for now, I&#039;m doing just fine, thanks very much.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>gloaming</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201295#msg-201295</guid>
            <title>Re: Dairy Products</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201295#msg-201295</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I don&#039;t know, I have a dairy sensitivity, even to A2, so I don&#039;t consume any.  I did consume brie prior to knowing about A2 and also my sensitivity (through blood tests) and what I learned, for me, was that too much calcium would &quot;lower the bar to afib triggers.&quot;  I was consuming enough brie (stress eating a wheel at a time), that the calcium was material for me.  This was 14 years ago.  A couple of years ago, I inadvertently consumed excess calcium that I didn&#039;t realize was in an ascorbic acid (vitamin C) supplement.   It did the same thing (lowering afib trigger bar).  When I discovered the calcium in the supplement and quit taking it, the trigger bar raised again.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>GeorgeN</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201230,201294#msg-201294</guid>
            <title>Re: Aspirin and Eliquis</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201230,201294#msg-201294</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I was after an aortic stent but I was bleeding out of everywhere.  (use your imagination). I was taken off Eliquis for the 6 months I had to be on the aspirin for the aortic stent (not regular stent).  I think if it is doctor indicated then .. you go with it unless you have a problem and then you discuss with them.  I also have a very complicated history.  I am happy to share in a DM]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bettylou4488</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201293#msg-201293</guid>
            <title>Re: Dairy Products</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201293#msg-201293</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks GeorgeN.  I just found out I can get A2 casein at our local Publix.  Should people that have AFIB as I do avoid even A2 milk and products?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Kselzer</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201292#msg-201292</guid>
            <title>Re: Fluoroscopy</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201292#msg-201292</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>Qwackertoo</strong><br />
What is the difference between a touch up ablation w/Watchman placement vs a Re-Do with Watchman placement?  When appointment is made within 3 days after the initial ablation?  </div></blockquote>
<br />
A touch-up procedure is finding the spots where afib signals are getting past the previous ablation lines. It&#039;s usually one or two burns vs dozens for a full ablation. And the Watchman is no more than another 10-15 minutes. My Watchman procedure was a total of 20 minutes and that included the entire time needed to insert and position the catheters. If a touch-up is being done at the same time, inserting and positioning catheters has already happened.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 23:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201291#msg-201291</guid>
            <title>Re: Dairy Products</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201291#msg-201291</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ From an autoimmune perspective, dairy from genetically A2 casein cows is better than from A1 casein cows.  Fermented A2 casein milk products like yogurt &amp; some cheeses are better.  Goat and sheep cheeses are better they are generally rich in A2 casein and medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs), which are easier to digest and less inflammatory than standard cow&#039;s milk products, as I understand.<br />
<br />
Most standard US cows genetically make A1 casein.  There are some A2&#039;s in this country, more in Europe.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>GeorgeN</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 23:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201290#msg-201290</guid>
            <title>Re: Fluoroscopy</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201290#msg-201290</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ What is the difference between a touch up ablation w/Watchman placement vs a Re-Do with Watchman placement?  When appointment is made within 3 days after the initial ablation?  <br />
<br />
Important success or failure difference or insurance terminology or?<br />
<br />
How would they know so fast after just the one night in the hospital with no further testing etc.?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Qwackertoo</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201289#msg-201289</guid>
            <title>Dairy Products</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201289,201289#msg-201289</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Just read The AFIB  Cure. Wonderful  book especially on diets. My question is concerning diary products. Are all products like yogurt milk cheese not good and should be avoided?  What about these products if from our local all grass fed cows. Thank you.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Kselzer</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201288#msg-201288</guid>
            <title>Re: Fluoroscopy</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201288#msg-201288</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ A touch-up ablation and Watchman should be much shorter than your initial procedure. And there&#039;s really no way around fluoroscopy. They have to know exactly where they are in the heart and they also need to check the Watchman for leaks. So minimizing the time they use it is really all they can do.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201287#msg-201287</guid>
            <title>Fluoroscopy</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201287,201287#msg-201287</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I don&#039;t have an ax to grind here, just sharing what little I have learned.  <br />
<br />
As I began to consider an ablation, I found youtube videos by Dr. Kneller.  In the end, I decided not to use him for my ablation, but his videos were informative for me, who knew nothing.  One of his videos, which I did not watch prior to my procedure, cautioned about the radiation exposure of the fluoroscopy, and cautioned to find a doctor who kept the radiation time to a minimum.<br />
<br />
I had Dr. Natale do mine.  As I read his clinical notes, I saw he used fluoroscopy on me for 15.6 minutes. <br />
<br />
Notes also said:<br />
<br />
Radiation dose <br />
<br />
Air Kerma(AK):  119mGy<br />
Dose Area Product (DAP):  1421uGy*m^2<br />
<br />
That didn&#039;t mean anything to me, so I asked my niece who was in nuclear medicine.  She said that dose is equivalent to two Ct scans of the head back to back.  Previously, when asking her opinions on letting oral surgeons do Ct scans on me, she said one per year of the head would be OK with her.  <br />
<br />
So in the case of a heart procedure, I can see why I would be expected to tolerate more time.  The medical team certainly has incentive to keep the amount of time to a minimum for their own health risk, despite their protective clothing.  <br />
<br />
I will have to ask how much fluoroscopy time will be required for my ablation touch-up/watchman placement in two months.  Just out of curiosity though.  I don&#039;t know enough to negotiate on that.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>nonthumper</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201286#msg-201286</guid>
            <title>Re: What % of EPs are capable of isolating LAA?</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201286#msg-201286</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <i>There are currently studying the use of an anticoagulant as a pill in a pocke[/i<br />
<br />
<i>That would be the REACT-AF trial. I have also adapted a modified version of that protocol in the past as opposed to daily AC, for reasons you mentioned.</i> <br />
<br />
My modification was to extend the one-hour, 30-day AC trigger point to 10 hours, based on both prior estimates of clot formation and the fact that trial participants are only required to wear the Apple Watch monitoring device 14-hours a day, which means in theory that an 11-hour AF window while not following the letter of the trial, does follow the spirit. The 10 hour wait gives ample time to convert either naturally or via PIP antiarrythmics, therefore limiting further the exposure to daily ACs. <br />
<br />
In addition to the pilot studies that REACT-AF is based on, newer studies are showing that AF frequency may be a more important factor than simply the CHADS risk score. All this makes me rethink the role of irreversible interventions such as Watchman and  LAA isolation, when it seems increasingly plausible that many of us may be managed either by PIP AC&#039;s in the future, or not even need them at all. Given my very low AF burden, my only hesitancy in embracing these emerging theories is that study data is weighted mostly for CHADS 1-3 and I&#039;m a CHADS 4. <br />
<br />
Jim</i>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mjamesone</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 18:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201285#msg-201285</guid>
            <title>Re: GLP-1 drugs lower AF risk regardless of weight loss</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201285#msg-201285</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I wonder if Micro dosing would have the same effect?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>hwkmn05</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201284#msg-201284</guid>
            <title>Re: What % of EPs are capable of isolating LAA?</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201284#msg-201284</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ If the pumping action is reduced to the point that requires lifelong anticoagulation or a laao device, then clinically speaking, it’s not pumping.  Also, the fact that Boston scientific is developing and is now testing a new generation of the watchman should lead to the conclusion that the leak problems of the previous generations are not merely theoretical.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>jasams</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200710,201283#msg-201283</guid>
            <title>Re: How can 4 TEES show my watchman is perfectly sealed and today a new TEE shows it leaking?</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200710,201283#msg-201283</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Sorry, my answer could be clearer.  First, it’s not well understood why the leaks lead to clots.  Is blood collecting in the leak space and clotting because the laa is not moving?  Or is the clots formed in the laa after it’s covered escaping from the leaks?  I don’t think they know, but some eps are. Concerned with the pooling and clotting.  Also, I think the laa is like an appendix; it’s not fully understood if it has another purpose.  I would avoid ablating it unless absolutely necessary, but I’m not a doctor.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>jasams</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201282#msg-201282</guid>
            <title>Re: GLP-1 drugs lower AF risk regardless of weight loss</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201282#msg-201282</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>mjamesone</strong><br />
After reading those trials, I was eager to get an Rx for a GLP-1RA after my stenting, even though I did not qualify based on weight. However, one of GLP&#039;s mechanisms is delayed gastric emptying, so in patients with underlying motility issues (like myself) they may be contraindicated, or at the very least ,cautioned.</div></blockquote>
<br />
My niece, in her 40&#039;s, is using a peptide that duplicates the pharma products, for weight loss.  However at a dramatically reduced dose.  For her, she gets the food noise reduction, without the other side effects.  My understanding of some of the unexpected benefits come from the body getting a higher level of GLP-1 (than normal) and there are GLP-1 receptors all over the body.  I think mechanisms are not well understood at this time, in many instances.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>GeorgeN</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 02:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201281#msg-201281</guid>
            <title>Re: GLP-1 drugs lower AF risk regardless of weight loss</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201281#msg-201281</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <i>&quot;.... [GLP-1-RAs are widely prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity and also are known to improve cardiovascular health, in part through weight loss...&quot;</i><br />
<br />
Yes, but kind of understated,  in that newer studies have already shown significant cardiac benefits, independent of weight loss. Given that, it&#039;s not surprising that some of the weight-independent cardiac mechanisms may also contribute to a reduced Afib risk.<br />
<br />
After reading those trials, I was eager to get an Rx for a GLP-1RA after my stenting, even though I did not qualify based on weight. However, one of GLP&#039;s mechanisms is delayed gastric emptying, so in patients with underlying motility issues (like myself) they may be contraindicated, or at the very least ,cautioned.<br />
<br />
Jim]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mjamesone</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201280#msg-201280</guid>
            <title>Re: What % of EPs are capable of isolating LAA?</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201280#msg-201280</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>jasams</strong><br />
I believe Natale does an electrical isolation of the laa when he does a watchman, since doing one after a watchman is much more complicated and prone to problems.  </div></blockquote>
<br />
This is not correct. Natale isolates the LAA only if the LAA is in fact a source of afib or flutter. The LAA can be isolated with a Watchman in place, but you&#039;re right that it does make it a little more complicated. But not impossible by any means. It&#039;s also not true that the LAA no longer pumps following isolation. Its pumping action may be reduced to the point where a Watchman or lifelong anticoagulation is necessary, but that&#039;s only true for about 60% of patients. About 40% don&#039;t need to do anything further.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201279#msg-201279</guid>
            <title>GLP-1 drugs lower AF risk regardless of weight loss</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201279,201279#msg-201279</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The following is a summary of a paper presented at HRS 2026 today. <br />
<br />
EMBARGOED UNTIL THURSDAY, APRIL 23 AT 11:00 AM CT / 12:00 PM ET <br />
 <br />
NEW STUDY LINKS GLP-1 MEDICATIONS TO LOWER RISK OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, INDEPENDENT OF WEIGHT LOSS <br />
CHICAGO, IL, APRIL 23, 2026 – A new study analyzing data from more than 13,000 patients found that people using the increasingly popular weight-loss drugs known as GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) have a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), even after accounting for the medications’ effects on weight loss and overall survival. Researchers presented these findings today at Heart Rhythm 2026.  <br />
<br />
When AF occurs, the heart beats irregularly and the risk of stroke, heart failure, and other cardiovascular complications are all increased. More than 40 million people worldwide live with AF, and in the United States alone, approximately 454,000 hospitalizations each year are associated with the condition.i,ii As new uses and benefits of GLP-1-RAs continue to emerge, researchers increasingly wanted to understand whether these therapies could help prevent AF or treat it. GLP-1-RAs are widely prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity and also are known to improve cardiovascular health, in part through weight loss. However, it is unclear whether their potential benefits for AF are primarily driven by weight reduction or whether the medications may have additional independent cardiovascular effects. <br />
<br />
Researchers conducted a single-center retrospective study of 13,034 patients who initiated GLP-1-RA therapy between January 2020 and May 2024. Researchers identified patients through electronic medical records and used propensity score matching to compare them with similar patients from a cohort of more than 385,000 individuals who had never received GLP-1-RA therapy and had no prior diagnosis of AF. <br />
The study found that patients who took GLP-1-RAs experienced significantly better survival than matched patients in the control group. Researchers also found a significantly lower risk of AF among patients taking GLP-1-RAs. Importantly, the reduction in AF risk remained consistent regardless of weight change. Patients who lost 10% or more of their body weight, those who lost less than 10%, and those who gained weight while taking GLP-1-RAs all experienced a reduced risk of AF compared with matched controls. Among the medications studied, semaglutide showed the strongest association with reduced AF risk compared with liraglutide, dulaglutide, and tirzepatide.  <br />
<br />
“As atrial fibrillation continues to affect more patients worldwide, clinicians need new strategies to reduce risk and improve long-term outcomes,” said Kenneth Bilchick, MD, professor of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Virginia. “These findings suggest GLP-1-RAs may influence heart rhythm through mechanisms beyond weight loss. Understanding those effects could help guide how we approach prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation in the future.” <br />
<br />
This study adds to a growing body of research examining the cardiovascular effects of GLP-1-RAs beyond diabetes and weight management. As researchers continue to explore these therapies, future studies will need to evaluate their potential role in AF prevention and management across larger and more diverse patient populations.  <br />
<br />
Session Details: <br />
<br />
“Clinical Electrophysiology: Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Independently of Effects on Weight Loss and Survival” [Thursday, April 23, 2026, at 2:30 pm CT]  <br />
i Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56–e528. <br />
ii Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, Sondhi M, Xu Y, et al. (2009) Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2 (4): 349-361]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201278#msg-201278</guid>
            <title>Re: generic for Xarelto</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201278#msg-201278</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>Carey</strong><br />
They are not. Generic 2.5 mg is available in the US but none of the other dosages are yet. Not sure why that is but I would expect it will rectify itself fairly soon.</div></blockquote>
<br />
I read the issue is US patent protection for the other dosages.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>GeorgeN</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200710,201277#msg-201277</guid>
            <title>Re: How can 4 TEES show my watchman is perfectly sealed and today a new TEE shows it leaking?</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200710,201277#msg-201277</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ &#039;...That’s why many eps don’t want to electricly isolate the laa, since then you’re on anticoagulants for life.&#039;<br />
<br />
I don&#039;t follow.  Isolating the LAA is to prevent the emanation of voltage from it which would cause the atrium to contract, but in this case to fibrillate. I would expect an EP to tell me they would first isolate the LAA and then do whatever else they need to do to seal it, which is then why the taking of a DOAC would be obviated.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>gloaming</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201243,201276#msg-201276</guid>
            <title>Re: Medication</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201243,201276#msg-201276</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ At 72 and just securing my 16 year Pin as an Afib Veteran, my perspective on Meds has changed from an as needed PIP to a low dose to circumvent an episode. An ounce of prevention. Staying out of afib now has become priority over going into it at any moment, anywhere, from 1-48 hours,  and with or without anyone who could possibly help me. One time in a remote part of Mexico and an hour drive to civilization. Ive dialed in a small dose for me, 75mg, just before bed, and I feel no side effects but the waking up with a racing HR at 2-4am is well under control. As a 90% nocturnal afibber, that is manageable. I have on hand the BB and the NOAC for the longer episodes, but so far still in the med cabinet. Sure the PIP was great for 12 years, until it wasnt. But, Youll know.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>hwkmn05</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201275#msg-201275</guid>
            <title>Re: generic for Xarelto</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201275#msg-201275</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I ordered 90/20 mg Generic for $117 US manf. Shipped from India. Out of 15mg, but have 2.5/10/20mgs.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>hwkmn05</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200710,201274#msg-201274</guid>
            <title>Re: How can 4 TEES show my watchman is perfectly sealed and today a new TEE shows it leaking?</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,200710,201274#msg-201274</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The first 3 generations of the watchman are rigid.  They are round devices out in an oval opening.  The belief was any remodeling of the heart perioperative would have the heart close any leaks.  It turned out that the rigid nature of the device resulted in the opposite affect.  That’s why a 4th generation device, watchman flx pro ng, is currently in trial.  Its frame is more flexible and the hope I’d leaks will seal and new leaks won’t form.  There’s also another device made of foam being tested, as well as a foam injection that is meant to fill and conform to the size and shape of the laa.  Boston scientific would not be under trial with the ng if the current watchman flx pro wasn’t forming leaks over time in some cases. The operator can do all he can to ensure no leaks at implantation, but leaks can form later.  That’s why many eps don’t want to electricly isolate the laa, since then you’re on anticoagulants for life.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>jasams</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 06:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201273#msg-201273</guid>
            <title>Re: What % of EPs are capable of isolating LAA?</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201200,201273#msg-201273</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I have been struggling with this very issue, but not because of persistent afib.  I had 2 ablations, the last over 4 years ago.  Since the end of the blanking period, I have had 3 episodes lasting a total of 14 hours.  That means my afib burden is 0.04%.  It’s well established that the lower the afib burden, the less likely the incidence of stroke.  A couple of years ago I had a bad fall.  I fractured a wrist in numerous places and had a double brain bleed.  I was eliquis during the fall.  Fortunately, the bleeds healed, and my neurologist cleared me to resume Eliquis.  I’ve had a few falls (not as serious) since and gone to er for ct scans.  No further bleeding.<br />
<br />
Not wanting to live like this for the rest of my life, I’ve been considering a watchman device to get off eliquis.  The problem was I never accepted that leaks under 5mm were clinically acceptable.  It was a random number.  In Europe they chose 3mm as their random number.  By now, many if not most top eps believe no leak is acceptable.  That’s why the watchman ng is currently being tested as well as a foam closure.  The goal for each is no leaks.<br />
<br />
I believe Natale does an electrical isolation of the laa when he does a watchman, since doing one after a watchman is much more complicated and prone to problems.  If the laa has been isolated, it no longer pumps and (1) will let blood accumulate and pool in a leak spot, and become a stroke risk, and (2) no longer produce some chemical that is now recognized as important.  All this without even knowing if isolating the laa will be beneficial.  I believe in burning only as much tissue as is needed to maintain nsr.<br />
<br />
There are currently studying the use of an anticoagulant as a pill in a pocket.  I don’t qualify for the study because of prior brain bleed, but that should really be irrelevant as my neurologist, one of the best in the USA, has cleared me for eliquis, which I’ve been taking since the bleed 2 years ago.  I may still follow this protocol because I don’t see the logic of being on a dangerous anticoagulant 100% of the time when I’m only in afib 0.04% of the time.  After a 1 hour or longer event, you take eliquis for 30 days.<br />
<br />
Any thoughts appreciated.  Anyone who thinks that an anticoagulant is safe, need not say so.  I strongly disagree and my goal is to get off it.  Cheers.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>jasams</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 03:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201272#msg-201272</guid>
            <title>Re: generic for Xarelto</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201272#msg-201272</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ They are not. Generic 2.5 mg is available in the US but none of the other dosages are yet. Not sure why that is but I would expect it will rectify itself fairly soon.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 03:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201271#msg-201271</guid>
            <title>Re: generic for Xarelto</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201271#msg-201271</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi<br />
<br />
No, I use 15mg. I don&#039;t know if all miligrams are covered in the states.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201270#msg-201270</guid>
            <title>Re: generic for Xarelto</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,201268,201270#msg-201270</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Looks like rivaroxaban 20 mg generic is now FDA approved.  Wonder if you can get that dose (I assume that is what you generally use) from the Israeli pharmacy?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>GeorgeN</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
