<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Magnesium Oxide vs Chelated</title>
        <description> Visited my cardio today and while he was listening to my heart it missed a couple of beats (PACS) which he said although not a problem can me the marker for AF.  He told me he has been seeing excellent results controlling AF  with Magnesium Oxide  1 gram a day. H said they come in 250 mg. of which he said to take four of daily.  He did forewarn me of diarrhea side effects.    
I am bad with numbers so presume 1 gram is 1,000 mgs. hence the four  250 mgs daily.   I, however, read on this site somewhere to use Chelated Magnesium of which I ordered and just received ten bottles of 100 mg tablets which I started taking today.  He said to use them up but 
magnesium oxide more effective.  Any disagreement with posters on this site familiar with both forms?  Also, I raised concerns about calcium channel blockers I have read about since I am on 48 mgs a day.  He said although much has been written in medical literature grouping all calcium channel blockers --------- Tiazac is the best and safest!   

Stephen</description>
        <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,345#msg-345</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 21:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,615#msg-615</guid>
            <title>Re: Mike - off topic</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,615#msg-615</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Carol,<br />
<br />
Actually the intent of my posting was just to point out that there is scientific evidence to back up the claim that magnesium oxide is poorly absorbed.  I would think that pretty well any organic magnesium compound is better absorbed than is magnesium oxide.  I have, a long time back, studied the Albion Process patent (US # 4,499,152) and some of their literature:<br />
<br />
www.albionlabs.com/human/Newsletter/1997January.pdf<br />
<br />
I find it all makes a lot of sense and personally believe that magnesium diglycinate or chelated magnesium (same thing) is the most bioavailable form of magnesium.  I use it myself.  I have not come across any medical studies comparing the oxide and the glycinate in normal, healthy subjects.<br />
<br />
Hans<br />
<br />
PS.  You can find the Albion Patent at the US Patent Office web site.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Hans Larsen</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,491#msg-491</guid>
            <title>Re: Mike - off topic</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,491#msg-491</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Mike:<br />
No, I didn&#039;t. Further north - Jarrow Co Durham (I come from good marching stock!)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>David Price</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 00:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,428#msg-428</guid>
            <title>Re: David - off topic</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,428#msg-428</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hans, <br />
Was I mistaken in thinking that the Medline abstract was supposed to include  comment on the glycinate form of magnesium? <br />
<br />
Please see my post attached to this.<br />
<br />
Carol]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,421#msg-421</guid>
            <title>David - off topic</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,421#msg-421</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ David,<br />
<br />
You didn&#039;t by any slight chance grow up in Bedale North Yorks did you?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Mike F. V42</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,408#msg-408</guid>
            <title>Re: Magnesium Oxide vs Chelated</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,408#msg-408</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ FWIW:<br />
Walt Stoll&#039;s site (generally considered whacky, but he was dead right about my hiatus hernia) dismisses oxide, in favour of pretty much anything with an &#039;ate&#039; on the end. I&#039;ve been using glycinate for a while and it seems to be effective. WS argues that oxide goes straight through the gut into the bowel, whereas the chelated forms ahve much more absorbtion - I take about 400 mg a day, but I&#039;ve become less picky about what I take - apart from oxide.<br />
<br />
David]]></description>
            <dc:creator>David Price</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,396#msg-396</guid>
            <title>Re: Magnesium Oxide vs Chelated</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,396#msg-396</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hans,<br />
I didn&#039;t see magnesium glycinate mentioned in the Firoz and Graber abstract that you mentioned.  It shows that oxide not a good form, but I am still in the dark about glycinate as far as studies are concerned.<br />
<br />
Carol]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,361#msg-361</guid>
            <title>Re: Magnesium Oxide vs Chelated</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,361#msg-361</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Stephen and Carol,<br />
<br />
Please see the following MEDLINE abstract<br />
<br />
[<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;list_uids=11794633&amp;dopt=Abstract"  rel="nofollow">www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</a>]<br />
<br />
Hans]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Hans Larsen</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,360#msg-360</guid>
            <title>Re: Magnesium Oxide vs Chelated</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,360#msg-360</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ You are so lucky to have such an up- to - date cardiologist, one who is willing to use so  - called alternative approaches! <br />
<br />
Dr. Mildred Seelig is the authority on magnesium.  She does not mention the chelated glycinate form in her book, The Magnesium Factor, and I don&#039;t know why.  I believe it is the oxide form that she recommends.  My book is on loan, so can&#039;t double check this for you.<br />
<br />
Carol]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 06:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,345#msg-345</guid>
            <title>Magnesium Oxide vs Chelated</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,345,345#msg-345</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Visited my cardio today and while he was listening to my heart it missed a couple of beats (PACS) which he said although not a problem can me the marker for AF.  He told me he has been seeing excellent results controlling AF  with Magnesium Oxide  1 gram a day. H said they come in 250 mg. of which he said to take four of daily.  He did forewarn me of diarrhea side effects.    <br />
I am bad with numbers so presume 1 gram is 1,000 mgs. hence the four  250 mgs daily.   I, however, read on this site somewhere to use Chelated Magnesium of which I ordered and just received ten bottles of 100 mg tablets which I started taking today.  He said to use them up but <br />
magnesium oxide more effective.  Any disagreement with posters on this site familiar with both forms?  Also, I raised concerns about calcium channel blockers I have read about since I am on 48 mgs a day.  He said although much has been written in medical literature grouping all calcium channel blockers --------- Tiazac is the best and safest!   <br />
<br />
Stephen]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
