<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM-PREDICTED BIOLOGICAL AGE GAP AND MORTALITY: CAPTURING DYNAMIC RISK WITH MULTIPLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS</title>
        <description> [www.heartrhythmjournal.com]</description>
        <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199448#msg-199448</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 14:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199882#msg-199882</guid>
            <title>Re: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM-PREDICTED BIOLOGICAL AGE GAP AND MORTALITY: CAPTURING DYNAMIC RISK WITH MULTIPLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199882#msg-199882</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ There is AI and there is AI. The AI used to analyze ekg&#039;s for diagnosis, whether in the doctor&#039;s office or on a Karida, Apple Watch, etc,, is not as good as a human and a good ep doesn&#039;t even read the AI analysis. But this study appears different in detecting subtle signs of accelerated aging that doctors may not see in a normal ekg. And the approach seems to be validated by thousands of patients in the study.<br />
<br />
Jim]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mjamesone</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199453#msg-199453</guid>
            <title>Re: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM-PREDICTED BIOLOGICAL AGE GAP AND MORTALITY: CAPTURING DYNAMIC RISK WITH MULTIPLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199453#msg-199453</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>gloaming</strong><br />
 I don&#039;t see why we&#039;d need AI to tell us that, though.</div></blockquote>
<br />
When I helped one of our members who had AI analysis on their overnight ECG, my opinion was the AI analysis was completely incorrect for their case (and I&#039;m certainly not an EP).]]></description>
            <dc:creator>GeorgeN</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 01:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199451#msg-199451</guid>
            <title>Re: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM-PREDICTED BIOLOGICAL AGE GAP AND MORTALITY: CAPTURING DYNAMIC RISK WITH MULTIPLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199451#msg-199451</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This sounds intuitively to be correct, Susan...to me.  A single ECG is like a single CAC score.  Pretty to look at, but it only tells you so much.  A series done over several years is likely to indicate a progression and a delta in speed or acceleration. I don&#039;t see why we&#039;d need AI to tell us that, though.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>gloaming</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 16:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199448#msg-199448</guid>
            <title>ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM-PREDICTED BIOLOGICAL AGE GAP AND MORTALITY: CAPTURING DYNAMIC RISK WITH MULTIPLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,199448,199448#msg-199448</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ [<a href="https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(25)02432-4/abstract?dgcid=raven_jbs_aip_email"  rel="nofollow">www.heartrhythmjournal.com</a>]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>susan.d</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 17:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
