<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Cryo Balloon silent stroke risks from gas emboli</title>
        <description> This seems unavoidable.  Metronic needs to straighten this out ASAP.  

[circep.ahajournals.org]

PS.  It may still be better than not doing anything as we don&amp;#039;t know what the baseline silent stroke risks are with AF.  Intermountain Utah has done some studies using their own data but almost all of that is comparing RF ablation vs AAD/waiting.</description>
        <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,159565,159565#msg-159565</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 23:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,159565,159565#msg-159565</guid>
            <title>Cryo Balloon silent stroke risks from gas emboli</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,159565,159565#msg-159565</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This seems unavoidable.  Metronic needs to straighten this out ASAP.  <br />
<br />
[<a href="http://circep.ahajournals.org/content/10/12/e005612.full?ijkey=Vv1bCYhWy29fo7C&amp;keytype=ref"  rel="nofollow">circep.ahajournals.org</a>]<br />
<br />
PS.  It may still be better than not doing anything as we don&#039;t know what the baseline silent stroke risks are with AF.  Intermountain Utah has done some studies using their own data but almost all of that is comparing RF ablation vs AAD/waiting.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>researcher</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
