<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Bolouke</title>
        <description> I never heard of it before about a week ago.   It was put in the same category as nattokinase, but was considered better(more effective).  Any opinions?

 Even better, any studies? 

 Thanks,</description>
        <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,131200,131200#msg-131200</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,131200,131205#msg-131205</guid>
            <title>Re: Bolouke</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,131200,131205#msg-131205</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Lisa... Lumbrokinase has been around a long time...it is effective and also more costly than nattokinase.  It&#039;s mentioned in the Conference Room sessions on nattokinase... #39 and 40.   <br />
<br />
Jackie]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,131200,131200#msg-131200</guid>
            <title>Bolouke</title>
            <link>https://www.afibbers.org/forum/read.php?9,131200,131200#msg-131200</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I never heard of it before about a week ago.   It was put in the same category as nattokinase, but was considered better(more effective).  Any opinions?<br />
<br />
 Even better, any studies? <br />
<br />
 Thanks,]]></description>
            <dc:creator>lisa s</dc:creator>
            <category>AFIBBERS FORUM</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 03:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
